Fix what the SEO crawl actually found
A short ordered list of page-level fixes, each already written as a ticket. Built for a marketer holding a 200-row audit export and no idea which row matters.
Ahrefs
Google Analytics
Linear
5 steps3 integrationsRuns on demand
A 200-row audit sorted by nothing useful. What it costs while the work is still done by hand.
- 01The audit lists everything at once, sorted by nothing useful.
- 02The fixable issues are buried under the ones you cannot act on.
- 03The export is read once and never opened again.
- Read crawl212 findings · 41 pages
- Keep fixable38 issues · rest dropped
- Rank pagessessions · top 12 first
- Draft fixes12 page-level changes
- Open ticketscreate_issue · 12 opened
One workflow, five steps. ModuleX drafts this graph from a single sentence, and every step stays editable.
- 01Read the crawl findings.Ahrefs
- 02Keep the issues that are actually fixable on your pages.ModuleX
- 03Order them by the pages that get traffic.Google Analytics
- 04Draft the specific change for each page.ModuleX
- 05Review, then open a ticket per fix.Linear
The workflow is an editable graph. Reading runs freely; review, then open a ticket per fix waits for your opt-in approval until you loosen it. The graph is the receipt.
Findings, turned into fixes. Paste this into ModuleX chat, or hit Use this workflow.
fix what the SEO crawl actually found: read the crawl findings; keep the issues that are actually fixable on your pages; order them by the pages that get traffic; draft the specific change for each page. Ask me before anything is sent or written.
to: composerOr skip the workflow entirely. Ask the assistant in chat and it runs the same job agentically: it picks the right actions, chains them, and reports back. The composer is for when you want it repeatable.
Fix what the SEO crawl actually found. A short ordered list of page-level fixes, each already written as a ticket.
- ahrefs · get_backlinks
- google analytics · run_report
- linear · create_issue
A short ordered list of page-level fixes, each already written as a ticket.
Where this fits. The tools it runs on, and the teams that run it.
Keep the momentum. Nearby workflows that reuse the accounts you just connected.
Adapt one announcement for each channelOne announcement, rewritten per channel, reviewed in one place before anything goes out. Built for a one-person marketing team posting the same text everywhere.
See which posts are actually being readA digest that separates the pieces people found from the pieces they did not. Built for a content lead who publishes steadily and reviews performance rarely.
Flag the campaigns that stopped workingA short list of campaigns to act on, each with the numbers that put it there, and your approval in front of the change. Built for a growth lead who notices wasted spend a month late.
About this use case.
No. It produces tickets; publishing changes stays with your team.